{"id":6168,"date":"2024-03-30T22:11:53","date_gmt":"2024-03-30T22:11:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/?p=6168"},"modified":"2024-03-30T22:12:54","modified_gmt":"2024-03-30T22:12:54","slug":"the-united-states-and-the-nato-non-extension-assurances-of-1990-new-light-on-an-old-problem","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/?p=6168","title":{"rendered":"The United States and the NATO Non-extension Assurances of 1990: New Light on an Old Problem?"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Author<\/b>: <\/span>Marc Trachtenberg<\/span><\/a><\/p>

Affiliation<\/b>: <\/span>University of California at Los Angeles<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Organization\/Publisher<\/b>: <\/span>International Security, MIT Press<\/span><\/a><\/p>

Date\/Place:<\/b> Jan 1, 2021\/USA<\/span><\/p>

Type of Literature:<\/b> Academic Journal article<\/span><\/p>

Number of Pages:<\/b> 42\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Link<\/b>: <\/span>https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/isec\/article\/45\/3\/162\/95270\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension<\/span><\/a>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>

Keywords:<\/b> NATO, US Hegemony, Russia, USSR, Eastern Europe, Spheres of Influence<\/span><\/i><\/p>

Brief:<\/b><\/p>

This article conclusively proves that the United States informally promised the Russians in 1990 that Eastern Europe would remain under a Russian sphere of influence. In February 1990, then US Secretary of State James Baker promised Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev that if Germany remains in NATO, \u201cthere would be no extension\u2026one inch to the east.\u201d In 2008, Gorbachev stated that the Americans \u201cpromised that NATO wouldn’t move beyond the boundaries of Germany after the Cold War but now half of central and Eastern Europe are members, so what happened to their promises? It shows they cannot be trusted.\u201d Gorbachev\u2019s assessment of Western intentions has become enshrined in official Russian grand strategy. In 2014, Putin reiterated Gorbachev\u2019s view when he said that Western leaders \u201clied to us many times, made decisions behind our backs, placed us before an accomplished fact. This happened with NATO’s expansion to the East, as well as the deployment of military infrastructure at our borders.\u201d The re-escalation of tensions in the Ukraine is a sore reminder that Russian leadership has not only taken note of broken promises, but intends to do everything in its power to check Western power in order to remind the West that we live in a realist multipolar world. The Russians may have believed in a globalized liberal order for a moment but their participation in the liberal order only proved their worst fears about US intentions. The author of this article walks through documented history in order to understand if and when the US gave Soviet leaders assurances in order to convince them to reel back military presence in Eastern Europe. Two points surrounding Western assurances are debated in the literature: scope and force. Were assurances provided by Baker and others only about Germany or Eastern Europe more generally? The author argues there is no doubt that the assurances apply to all of Eastern Europe. Second, do verbal assurances in international affairs have any binding force? Many American diplomats have argued that since nothing was signed, the promises amount to no deal. The author argues that while that may be true, such a claim does not stand in terms of all the deals struck between the two powers over the course of the Cold War. In many instances verbal assurances were taken as binding agreements. Even if there were no written agreements, a high-level diplomatic agreement, even verbal, has political weight and consequences. The author concludes on a more conciliatory note in acknowledging that there was bad faith in the fact that goals changed, but this did not mean that the US deliberately misled the Soviet Union. The reneging on the 1990 assurances regarding NATO expansion convinced Russian elites that participation in a liberal order only means submitting to US interests and nothing else.<\/span><\/p>


By:<\/b> M. \u00dcveys Han, CIGA Senior Research Associate<\/span><\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Author: Marc Trachtenberg Affiliation: University of California at Los Angeles\u00a0 Organization\/Publisher: International Security, MIT Press Date\/Place: Jan 1, 2021\/USA Type of Literature: Academic Journal article Number of Pages: 42\u00a0 Link: https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/isec\/article\/45\/3\/162\/95270\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension\u00a0 Keywords: NATO, US Hegemony, Russia, USSR, Eastern Europe, Spheres of Influence Brief: This article conclusively proves that the United States informally promised the Russians […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":6169,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6168","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-global-perspective-and-critical-research"],"blocksy_meta":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"featured_image_urls":{"full":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension.png",1166,450,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension-150x150.png",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension-300x116.png",300,116,true],"medium_large":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension-768x296.png",768,296,true],"large":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension-1024x395.png",1024,395,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension.png",1166,450,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension.png",1166,450,false]},"author_info":{"info":["CIGA Staff"]},"category_info":"Global Perspective & Critical Research<\/a>","tag_info":"Global Perspective & Critical Research","comment_count":"0","rttpg_featured_image_url":{"full":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension.png",1166,450,false],"landscape":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension.png",1166,450,false],"portraits":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension.png",1166,450,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension-150x150.png",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension-300x116.png",300,116,true],"large":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension-1024x395.png",1024,395,true],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension.png",1166,450,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension.png",1166,450,false]},"rttpg_author":{"display_name":"CIGA Staff","author_link":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/?author=23"},"rttpg_comment":0,"rttpg_category":"Global Perspective & Critical Research<\/a>","rttpg_excerpt":"Author: Marc Trachtenberg Affiliation: University of California at Los Angeles\u00a0 Organization\/Publisher: International Security, MIT Press Date\/Place: Jan 1, 2021\/USA Type of Literature: Academic Journal article Number of Pages: 42\u00a0 Link: https:\/\/direct.mit.edu\/isec\/article\/45\/3\/162\/95270\/The-United-States-and-the-NATO-Non-extension\u00a0 Keywords: NATO, US Hegemony, Russia, USSR, Eastern Europe, Spheres of Influence Brief: This article conclusively proves that the United States informally promised the Russians…","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6168","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6168"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6168\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6169"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6168"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6168"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/geopoliticalcompass.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6168"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}